War with Iran to "end soon"
Washington : Tensions in the Middle East remain high as the ongoing conflict involving Iran, Israel, and the United States enters a volatile phase, with mixed signals emerging from Washington regarding the future course of the war.
US President Donald Trump said on Monday that the conflict with Iran could end “very soon,” asserting that the joint US-Israeli military campaign has significantly weakened Iran’s military capabilities. According to the President, the operations have effectively destroyed large portions of Iran’s navy, air force, and drone manufacturing infrastructure, dealing a severe blow to the country’s defence systems.
Despite the optimistic tone, Trump’s remarks reflected shifting and sometimes contradictory positions on the war. While he described the military action as an “excursion” that was not formally approved, he simultaneously warned that the United States could launch massive retaliatory strikes if Iran attempts to disrupt global oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical energy corridors.
The President also suggested that several key Iranian targets, including the country’s electrical grid, remain deliberately untouched and could be struck if the conflict escalates further.
The administration’s ultimate objectives remain uncertain. At different moments, Trump indicated that the war was nearly won, while also stating that Iran must accept unconditional surrender for a definitive victory. Analysts say these contrasting statements have contributed to uncertainty in diplomatic circles and volatility in global markets.
Politically, Trump also commented on developments inside Iran following the appointment of Mojtaba Khamenei to a prominent leadership role, describing the move as a “negative development.” The US President indicated that he would prefer to see an alternative internal leadership emerge within Iran, though he did not elaborate on how such a transition might occur.
Trump further revealed that he held a positive discussion with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who expressed interest in helping to address the escalating crisis. The possibility of Russia playing a mediating role has sparked speculation about potential diplomatic efforts to prevent a wider regional conflict.
However, critics argue that the administration’s approach — declaring near victory while simultaneously threatening further escalation — reflects a lack of a clear and consistent strategy, particularly regarding the question of regime change in Iran.
As the conflict continues to unfold, global markets, energy supply routes, and regional security dynamics remain closely tied to developments in the Middle East, with the Strait of Hormuz emerging as a critical flashpoint that could determine whether tensions ease or escalate further.
